Respuesta :
The two legal cases that questioned the legal status of relocation camps were Hirabayashi v. United States (1943) and Korematsu v. United States (1944).
Relocation:
It is the process of one or more individuals leaving one dwelling and settling in another.
Hirabayashi v. United States:
- It was a case in which the United States Supreme court held that the application of curfews against members of a minority group were constitutional when the nation was at war with the country from which that group's ancestors originated.
- The case arose out of the issuance of Executive order 9066 following the attack on Pearl Harbor and the U.S. entry in the World War ll.
- The plaintiff, Gordon Hirabayashi was convicted of violating the curfew and had appealed to the Supreme court.
Korematsu v. United States:
- A legal case in which the U.S. Supreme court, on December 18, 1944, upheld (6-3) the conviction of Fred Korematsu - a son of Japanese immigrants who was born in Oakland, California - for having violated an exclusion order requiring him to submit to forced relocation during World War ll.
To know more about relocation camps visit:
https://brainly.com/question/6632545
#SPJ4
