Question

PART B: Which detail from the text best supports the answer to Part A?
A.
“For one thing, political preferences aren't just reasoned opinions; they're often markers of personal and cultural identity with strong emotional resonance.” ( Paragraph 5)
B.
“Under the right conditions, many people fail to recognize that a choice they made previously has been swapped with an alternative.” ( Paragraph 7)
C.
“In other words, people were less critical of the very same arguments when they produced them themselves than when they were later presented as coming from another person.” ( Paragraph 12)
D.
“The authors of the study take them as evidence for a theory according to which human reasoning is principally geared towards effective argumentation rather than knowledge-seeking.” ( Paragraph 13)

Answer 1

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

"The Selective Laziness Of Human Reasoning" is an article written by Tania Lombrozo. The aticle talks about how people tend to focus on the flaws of others argument than evaluating their own arguments. To prove this thesis, a research was conducted by the researchers in which the choice blindness concept was adopted. The choices that were made by the participants were swaped and mostly people failed to recognize the swap and presented their argument over the choice that they did not make previously.

The correct option to support the claim of the main idea of the text is C. When the choices made by participants were swapped and not recognized by them, they produced the argument over the choice that they did not make and were critical about the arguments they produced when they were coming from others.

So, the correct answer is option C.

Answer 2

The detail from the text best supports the answer to Part A is

Option C :

In other words, people were less critical of the very same arguments when they produced them themselves than when they were later presented as coming from another person.” ( Paragraph 12)

The Selective Laziness Of Human Reasoning is an article composed by Tania Lombrozo. The aticle discusses how individuals will quite often zero in on the blemishes of others contention than assessing their own contentions.

To demonstrate this postulation, an examination was led by the specialists in which the decision visual impairment idea was embraced. The decisions that were made by the members were swaped and generally individuals neglected to perceive the trade and introduced their contention over the decision that they didn't make already.  

The right choice to help the case of the primary thought of the text is C. At the point when the decisions made by members were traded and not perceived by them, they created the contention over the decision that they didn't make and were basic with regards to the contentions they delivered when they were coming from others.

For more information, refer the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/22906165