"Under our Constitution, free speech is not a right that is given only to be so circumscribed that it exists in principle, but not in fact. Freedom of expression would not truly exist if the right could be exercised only in an area that a benevolent government has provided as a safe haven for crackpots." which is the best summary of the passage?

In his majority opinion on Tinker v. Des Moines, Justice Fortas argues that free speech would not truly exist if people could only express their opinion in a designated place.

Answer Link

aliasger2709 aliasger2709 · Answer 2 · 2022-06-10T11:22:46+02:00

Tinker v. Des Moines expresses the rights of freedom and its practices. The excerpt details how free speech will not be truly unrestrained if ideas are expressed at designated places.

What is free speech?

Free speech is a right that provides the support and freedom to an individual to openly express their ideas, thoughts, and opinions, with certain limitations. It is a principle that allows the unrestricted voice of the people.

In the excerpt, the expression of the voice and opinion at only certain places means that is not truly free speech as it has restrictions of expression of the thoughts that are limited to places.

Therefore, free speech is not unrestricted if hindered by places.

Learn more about free speech here:

https://brainly.com/question/9897258

#SPJ2