Answer: Both represent inductive arguments.
Step-by-step explanation: A deductive argument is a form of reasoning in which the conclusion follows the premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion also must be true.
On the other hand, an inductive argument refers to a form of reasoning in which the premises do not provide absolute assurance as far as the conclusion's truth.
The arguments provided can be categorized as inductive because the conclusion (the wind must blow more often in the winter than in the summer) is derived from a specific observation (January is windier than July). This generalizes the observation to a broader conclusion based solely on observation in the absence of certainty. The arguments suggest a pattern according to what was given; however, it lacks the necessary understanding to qualify it as deductive. Therefore, the given arguments are inductive.
The argument about windier months is inductive because it draws a probable conclusion from specific observations, which could have exceptions, rather than ensuring a definite conclusion if the premises are true.
The argument that January is windier than July, and therefore the wind must blow more often in the winter than in the summer, is an example of inductive reasoning. In inductive arguments, the premises provide some evidence for the truth of the conclusion, but do not guarantee it. This contrasts with deductive reasoning, where if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. The given argument is inductive because it is based on observations that could potentially have exceptions. For instance, while January may indeed be windier, there might be atypical years or other locations where this pattern does not hold. Thus, the conclusion drawn is probable, but not certain.
