Proponents of "no taxation without representation" claimed that although trade regulation was a legal means for parliament to raise revenue, direct internal taxes such as the stamp act were an illegitimate extension of parliamentary power. True or false?.

Proponents of "no taxation without representation" claimed that although trade regulation was a legal means for parliament to raise revenue, direct internal taxes such as the stamp act were an illegitimate extension of parliamentary power. The given statement is false.

What did no taxation without representation mean?

A population that is compelled to pay taxes to a government authority without having any input on that government's policy is referred to as having taxation without representation. "Taxation without representation is tyranny," was the catchphrase used by American colonists to rebel against their British overlords.

Who first said no taxation without representation?

"Taxation without representation is tyranny," the phrase that became an anti-British catchphrase before the American Revolution, is generally attributed to James Otis around 1761 and reflects the resentment of American colonists at being taxed by a British Parliament to which they did not elect representatives.

Learn more about no taxation without representation: https://brainly.com/question/788892

#SPJ4