The supreme court’s approach during the period from the 1950s through the 1970s in deciding cases on constitutional grounds is described as c. judicial activism.
Judicial activism is a form of judicial review in which the judiciary protects or expands individual rights by reaching decisions that depart from established precedent or are independent of or in opposition to recognized constitutional or legislative intent.
Judicial activism is the opposite of judicial restraint, in which the judges restrain themselves from being actively involved in making new laws through judicial reviews so that prevailing politics hold.
a. judicial restraint.
b. judicial review.
c. judicial activism.
d. congressional restraint
Thus, the supreme court’s approach during the period from the 1950s through the 1970s in deciding cases on constitutional grounds is described as c. judicial activism.
Learn more about judicial activism at https://brainly.com/question/509532 and https://brainly.com/question/15452280
#SPJ12
