Question

explain how the ruling of Dred Scott v. Sandford illustrated the differences between the political goals of the North and the South.

Answer 1

it illustrated differences because it showed how the two areas, north and south, had differences in belief. it also helped to show that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional because all slave owners had the right to take there property wherever they pleased.

Answer 2

Answer:

The North and south had different views on their beliefs, and thus lead to conflict

Explanation:

The ruling of Dred Scott vs Sandford, illustrated the differences between the political goals of the North and the South explains how the two regions involved, north and south, had contrary opinions and  differences in rust.

it  helped to show that the compromise of  was Missouri  was not constitutional because all slave owners had the right to carry or move there property wherever they pleases.