Question

A scientist plans to study two different species of birds on the Galapagos Islands over a five-year period of time. Species A demonstrates flocking behavior while foraging. Species B does not. The scientist predicted that species B would be more successful. His primary evidence behind this prediction is the lack of competition between individuals for food.

- Identify the evidence the scientist used to support the prediction.

- Identify other evidence in the animal kingdom that may be relevant to this claim.

- Use the evidence to defend or refute the scientist's prediction.

- Explain the cause-and-effect relationship between group behaviors, an individual's survival, and the species' survival.

Answer 1

Given what we know, we can confirm that the prediction of the scientist will turn out to be true.

Why is the prediction of the scientist true?

This has to do with the way in which animals compete for food. Though there are some benefits to flocking in nature, such as increased protection against predators, there are more downsides. Some of these include:

• Easier to be spotted by predators.
• More competition for food.
• Harder to cover larger areas.

This all amounts to the scientist's claim that species B would be more successful.

Therefore, we can confirm that the prediction of the scientist will turn out to be true in that species B would be more successful.

To learn more about competition visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18339948?referrer=searchResults