Using the z-distribution, as we are working with a proportion, it is found that since the test statistic is less than the critical value for the right-tailed test, there is not enough evidence to conclude that there has been an increase in the proportion of all kochia plants that are resistant to glyphosate.
In this problem, we consider that:
At the null hypothesis, we test if there has been no increase, that is, the subtraction is of 0.
[tex]H_0: p_2 - p_1 = 0[/tex]
At the alternative hypothesis, we test if there has been an increase, hence:
[tex]H_1: p_2 - p_1 \neq 0[/tex].
The proportions and standard errors are given by:
[tex]p_1 = 0.197, s_1 = \sqrt{\frac{0.197(0.803)}{61}} = 0.0509[/tex]
[tex]p_2 = 0.385, s_2 = \sqrt{\frac{0.385(0.615)}{52}} = 0.0675[/tex]
Hence, the distribution has mean and standard error given by:
[tex]\overline{p} = p_2 - p_1 = 0.0675 - 0.0509 = 0.0166[/tex]
[tex]s = \sqrt{s_1^2 + s_2^2} = \sqrt{0.0509^2 + 0.0675^2} = 0.0845[/tex]
It is given by:
[tex]z = \frac{\overline{p} - p}{s}[/tex]
In which p = 0 is the value tested at the null hypothesis, hence:
[tex]z = \frac{0.0166}{0.0845}[/tex]
[tex]z = 0.2[/tex]
Considering a right-tailed test, as we are testing if the proportion is greater than a value, with a significance level of 0.05, the critical value is of [tex]z^{\ast} = 1.645[/tex]
Since the test statistic is less than the critical value for the right-tailed test, there is not enough evidence to conclude that there has been an increase in the proportion of all kochia plants that are resistant to glyphosate.
More can be learned about the z-distribution at https://brainly.com/question/26454209