Respuesta :
Answer:
1. The two points of view on humans living in communities differ.
2. People should choose whether or not they want to be a member of a community or whether they choose to be alone.
Explanation:
Humans living in communities, according to Viewpoint #1, is a really positive thing. They think that by forming large social networks, we may live in peace and comfort without having to do everything ourselves. Additionally, our capacity to care for ourselves was most likely influenced by our upbringing and interactions with others.
Humans living in communities, according to Viewpoint #2, is really awful. They think that whether or not we are part of a community, we will find methods to stay alive. The majority of this stems from the belief that social conventions such as etiquette and traditions are not required for human life.
Answer:
suggest to switch up some words
Explanation:
In Viewpoint #1 it talks about how humans living in communities is a positive thing. It says by forming large social networks, we can live in peace and comfort. This way we wouldn’t have to do everything alone or ourselves.
As for Viewpoint #2, it talked about how humans living in communities is a negative thing. The writer thought whether or not humans were part of a community, we would still find ways to survive or stay alive. It talks about how traditions and customs are not necessary for human life.
Both viewpoints discuss humans living in communities. Viewpoint #1 discusses the pros and Viewpoint #2 discusses how it wouldn’t matter if we did or didn’t live in a community. Personally, I believe that we should live in communities because we can all work together.