Answer:
Option A (The relevance of numerous cases is discussed by the justices) is the right response.
Explanation:
Please find the attachment of the question.
- Furthermore, this ordinance specifies whether, throughout the case of disputes between two or more countries, the Supreme Court has both predominant including special judicial power, and therefore no court below should hear certain objections.
- The proportion of power generating evidence presented by that of the court becomes minute, always one or twice such instances per campaign have usually been heard.
All the other three methods mentioned just aren't connected to the situation given. So, the option A is therefore the right one.
