princesslori princesslori

18-09-2016
History

contestada

Why must historians always be skeptical when they read primary sources documents?

Respuesta :

shadowfall shadowfall

18-09-2016

Because they could be biased and strongly opinionated and also the primary source does not have the benefit of hindsight and is therefore not a valid interpretation and less credible

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Find the equation of the line that passes through (4, 2) and (-5,3).

Which factors make studying hadal zone ecosystems difficult?

The first settlers in North America where from which area

Alicia's family wants to save for a four-year college education for her. After some research, they estimate that the total cost will be about $78,000. How much

Federal agencies: set conduct guidelines for people working in salons. regulate the licensing of cosmetologists. set guidelines for employee handbooks for sa

Estimate the quotient by rounding each number to the nearest whole number. 33.7/ 9.5

A specimen of copper having a rectangular cross section 15.2 mm × 19.1 mm (0.60 in. × 0.75 in.) is pulled in tension with 44,500 N (10,000 lbf) force, producing

When using the continuum leadership model, before selecting one of the seven leadership styles, the leader must consider all of the following variables EXCEPT:

How likely is it to spin a vowel on this spinner? A Certain B Likely C As likely as not D Unlikely E Impossible

In what ways did the Mississippian Indians and Europeans interact with each other?

ACCESS MORE