Respuesta :
Answer:
(a) The test statistics is 1.30.
(b) The P-value is 0.198.
(c) We conclude that the mean waiting time was equal to 3.9 minutes.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that the mean waiting time at the drive-through window for branches in your geographical region, as measured from the time a customer places an order until the time the customer receives the order, was 3.9 minutes.
You select a random sample of 64 orders. The sample mean waiting time is 4.03 minutes, with a sample standard deviation of 0.8 minutes.
Let [tex]\mu[/tex] = mean waiting time at the drive-through window for branches in your geographical region.
So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] = 3.9 minutes {means that the mean waiting time was equal to 3.9 minutes}
Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu\neq[/tex] 3.9 minutes {means that the mean waiting time was different from 3.9 minutes}
The test statistics that would be used here One-sample t test statistics as we don't know about the population standard deviation;
T.S. = [tex]\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex] ~ [tex]t_n_-_1[/tex]
where, [tex]\bar X[/tex] = sample mean waiting time = 4.03 minutes
s = sample standard deviation = 0.8 minutes
n = sample of orders = 64
So, test statistics = [tex]\frac{4.03-3.9}{\frac{0.8}{\sqrt{64} } }[/tex] ~ [tex]t_6_3[/tex]
= 1.30
(a) The value of t test statistics is 1.30.
(b) The P-value of the test statistics is given by;
P-value = P( [tex]t_6_3[/tex] > 1.30) = 0.099
For two tailed test, p-value is calculated as = 0.099 [tex]\times[/tex] 2 = 0.198
(c) Since, in the question we are not given with the level of significance so we assume it to be 5%.
Now, P-value of the test statistics is more than the level of significance as 0.198 > 0.05, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis.
Therefore, we conclude that the mean waiting time was equal to 3.9 minutes.