Question

Please help me ASAP!!!

14 POINTS!!!

Will MARK brainliest!!!!

( no options for first image)

Second image options!!

Blank 1:

A) renewable
B) nonrenewable
C) polluting

Blank 2:

A) it will destroy ecosystems
B) it requires fossil fuels
C) it won't be useful for irrigation

Image 3 options!!!

Blank 1:

A) tagging
B) point counts
C) area searches

Blank 2.
A) decrease the number of trees in their habitat
B)fragment the forests where they live
C)designate their area as a national park

Answer 1

The Answer of 1st Question must be 11567 Answer Came through Calculations\

/////////////////////////

The Answers of 2nd Image are :

(a) Renewable Energy

(b) Destroy Ecosystem

//////////////////////////

Answer of last image is :

{1} Tagging of Tigers

{2} Designating their  Area as A National Park

Answer 2

Image 1 -

So, if there is a 5% increase every year, it means that in 3 there will be a increase of:

500 in the first year - 10 000 * 5 / 100

525 in the second year - 10 500 * 5 / 100

551.5 in the third year - 11 025 * 5 / 100

Now we add that all up:

11 576.5

Answer:

11 576.5

Image 2 -

It's renewable because it depends on something as simple as water flow.

I think building dams has many advantages, but many ecological disadvantages. It interferes in flooding which cause a lot of damage and it can also affect some species migration such as fish.

Answers:

A. and A.

Image 3 -

The most common and efficient way of doing this monitoring, especially with endangered species is probably tagging. Point count, as far as I know, is only used for bird monitoring and area searches are not effective at all.

When you designate an area as a nation park, it acquires certain protection laws (I think it works like so in all countries) that protect the species in it. Decreasing the number of trees does not make any sense and fragmenting the forests can only make things worse.

Answers:

A. and C.

Hope it helped,

BioTeacher101