Answer:
[tex] h(x) [/tex] is increasing.
Step-by-step explanation:
I'll try to give you an intuition - although informal, of course. If [tex] g(x) [/tex] is a decreasing function, then [tex] g(-x) [/tex] means to read the graph of [tex] g(x) [/tex] "backwards", and thus making it increasing. At that point, [tex] f(g(-x)) [/tex] is a composition of two increasing function, and is thus increasing.
Now, for a formal answer, let's simply pick two inputs [tex] x_1<x_2 [/tex] (we will assume that the range of [tex] g(x) [/tex] is part of the domain of [tex] f(x) [/tex], otherwise you couldn't compute [tex] f(g(-x)) [/tex])
Since [tex] g(x) [/tex] is decreasing, we have
[tex] x_1<x_2 \implies g(x_1)>g(x_2) [/tex]
But we want to compute [tex]g(-x) [/tex], so we have
[tex] x_1<x_2 \implies -x_1>-x_2 \implies g(-x_1)<g(-x_2) [/tex]
Since [tex] f(x) [/tex] is increasing, we have
[tex] x_1<x_2 \implies f(x_1)<f(x_2) [/tex]
and thus
[tex] g(-x_1)<g(-x_2) \implies f(g(-x_1))<f(g(-x_2)) [/tex]
So, we've shown that, given two inputs [tex] x_1<x_2 [/tex], the images are in the same order: [tex] f(g(-x_1))<f(g(-x_2)) [/tex]
This, by definition, means that [tex] f(g(-x)) [/tex] is an increasing function.