How did interpretations of the idea that all people have "unalienable Rights" change between the writing of the Declaration of Independence and today?

A. Interpretations expanded to protect more rights over time.
B. Interpretations varied because Americans abandoned
Enlightenment values.
C. Interpretations narrowed to protect fewer rights over time.
D. Interpretations changed very little as few citizens challenged them.

The inalienable rights are those considered as fundamental; which cannot be legitimately denied a person. No government or authority has the power to deny them, since they are part of the essence of the person. Human rights are inalienable rights.

These types of rights, on the other hand, are inalienable. No subject can part with them, not even of their own free will. For example: there is no voluntary slavery. A person cannot renounce his freedom and submit voluntarily to the mandates of another human being.

Other inalienable human rights are that of equality and fraternity. It should be mentioned that they are considered fundamental for the normal development of an individual and consist of the ethical and moral basis that protects the dignity of people.

The inalienable rights are inherent to the individual by the mere fact of belonging to the human species. This means that the way in which they are acquired is involuntary. From the moment an individual is born, he owns them and cannot get rid of them until the day of his death. And there is no possible legal order or punishment that can deprive you of these rights.