Question

Read the excerpt from "The Most Dangerous Game,” by Richard Connell. So intent was the Cossack on his stalking that he was upon the thing Rainsford had made before he saw it. His foot touched the protruding bough that was the trigger. Even as he touched it, the general sensed his danger and leaped back with the agility of an ape. But he was not quite quick enough; the dead tree, delicately adjusted to rest on the cut living one, crashed down and struck the general a glancing blow on the shoulder as it fell; but for his alertness, he must have been smashed beneath it. He staggered, but he did not fall; nor did he drop his revolver. How is this scene different in the film adaptation of "The Most Dangerous Game”?

Answer 1

Well for starters in the film adaptation there is a woman who is not mentioned is the short story and in the film adaptation the general whips the trap setting it off before him. therefore he does not get trapped under it

Answer 2

The inference shows that the scene is different in the film adaptation of The Most Dangerous Game as General Zaroff avoids the trap that Rainsford set.

What is an inference?

It should be noted that an inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information given in a story.

In this case, the inference shows that the scene is different as General Zaroff avoids the trap that Rainsford set. Here, even though his foot touched the protruding bough that was the trigger, the general sensed his danger and leaped back.

Learn more about inference on:

https://brainly.com/question/25280941