Which statement is most likely an interpretation of the Second Amendment?
A.) No one should be able to own or use a gun.
B.) Only local governments can pass gun laws.
C.) Bearing arms is only for the purpose of hunting.
D.) There should be no limits on owning and using guns.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

So, since this statute does not say anything about the limits of keeping and bearing arms, one thing that we can easily interpret from it is that "there should be no limits on owning and using guns." In reality, however, this Amendment has caused a lot of controversies as many citizens disagree that people has the right to own and use guns.

Which statement is most likely an interpretation of the Second Amendment? A.) No one should be able to own or use a gun. B.) Only local governments can pass gun laws. C.) Bearing arms is only for the purpose of hunting. D.) There should be no limits on owning and using guns.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Which statement is most likely an interpretation of the Second Amendment?
A.) No one should be able to own or use a gun.
B.) Only local governments can pass gun laws.
C.) Bearing arms is only for the purpose of hunting.
D.) There should be no limits on owning and using guns.