Question

Read this statement:
Was the diet of a poor urban family in the early 20th century that much more nutritious than a McDonald's combo platter? Maybe it was; I'd just like to know.
In "A Culinary Wasteland," what argument made in Fast Food Nation is Crossen refuting with the statement above?

A. People who eat fast food are ignorant and do not know what a proper meal tastes like.
B. People would demand change in the fast-food industry if they could see behind the scenes.
C. Fast food causes severe health problems and should be banned by the U.S. Congress.
D. The current American diet lacks nutrition as a result of the consumption of fast food.

Answer 1

Answer: The current American diet lacks nutrition as a result of the consumption of fast food.

Answer 2

Because so much fast food is consumed in the United States, the diet is currently lacking in nourishment. Thus, option D is correct.

What is A Culinary Wasteland?

The essay “A Culinary Wasteland” was written with the explicit purpose of expressing a viewpoint on the book Fast Food Nation. Eric Schlosser examines the global effects of the American fast food industry in his book Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal.

In this book, it was said that the food platter or the meal provided by a fast food chain like McDonald's was not nutrient enough.

So all the food that the poor urban family was taking lacked nutritional content which was necessary for the body. Therefore, option D is the correct option.

Learn more about A Culinary Wasteland, here:

https://brainly.com/question/3050059

#SPJ5