Respuesta :
I would choses D because Wendy sees the author explaining that the 16 year old has the same responsibility's just about as the 18 year
Answer:
D.Wendy’s thesis is acceptable because it expresses a viewpoint and has text evidence.
Explanation:
This is the best proof. Because if it is a study, it means that it is proof and unbiased. The first option is biased because you are participating in the campaign. The second option has nothing to do with the reason for voting at 16 as it only sees adults. The last option is irrelevant because of different cultures and people aged 16 years. These parts in the thesis are acceptable as wendy proofed that sixteen-year-olds have the responsibility of being students, having jobs, and in some states holding drivers’ licenses are a valid point so the voting age should be changed.
Learn more :
https://brainly.com/question/7434700?referrer=searchResults