Often humans work to preserve biomes that are visually attrac tive. Are there biomes that might be lost because they are not attractive? Is this a problem?
Humans do indeed try to erase biomes that we deem not aesthetically pleasing. This is a huge problem because there are many important organisms in these biomes and we are taking their homes away from them just because their home isn't pleasing to our eyes. I hope this answered your question, my friend.
The loss of biomes commonly not considered as 'visually attractive' is a real problem because these biomes also help to maintain the delicate equilibrium of the Earth's planet and have unique patterns of biodiversity.
A biome can be defined as a large geographic region that is characterized by similar patterns of vegetation, soil, climatic factors (e.g., temperature), etc.
The major biomes include aquatic biome, grassland, desert, forest, and tundra.
There are some biomes being destroyed faster than others (e.g., forests), but all of them are equally important to maintain the delicate equilibrium in Eart's planet and its biodiversity.
For example, deserts might not be considered visually attractive when compared with forests, but desert destruction for mining purposes represents a real problem due to the extinction of unique species that live in these regions.
In conclusion, the loss of biomes commonly not considered as 'visually attractive' is a real problem because these biomes also help to maintain the delicate equilibrium of the Earth's planet and have unique patterns of biodiversity.
