Which statement does not support the explanation for how planets formed by accretion of particles?
As the mass of a particle increases, so does its gravitational influence.
Particles frequently collide with one another at rapid speeds.
As gravity pulls the nebular disk inward, the disk spins faster.
Frequent collisions turned rocks to dust, pushing the dust deeper into space.
Particles rotate in the same direction as the nebular disk

Particles accumulate due to force of gravity in the accretion process. With increase in mass, gravity increases which pulls in more mass. This leads to formation of of bigger massive objects. The frequency of collisions between particles increases. Particles collide and stick with each other. This generates large amount of heat.This is how, planets and other celestial bodies are formed. As gravity pulls the nebular disk inward, the disk spins faster. Particles rotate in the same direction as the nebular disk.

Thus, the statement which does not support formation of planets through accretion process is: Frequent collisions turned rocks to dust, pushing the dust deeper into space.

610059049 610059049 · Answer 2 · 2021-03-05T06:17:09+01:00

610059049 610059049

05-03-2021

Answer:

its Frequent collisions turned rocks to dust, pushing the dust deeper into space. D

Explanation:

plato

Answer Link