Respuesta :
you have to have an understanding of the concept of 'art'. To me, art
is showing something to someone in a new way. A farmer sees a painter
has set up his easel on the edge of the road and is painting a picture
of the farmer's barn. The farmer looks over the painter's shoulder and
says 'Wow, I never realized that barn was so pretty!' The artist is
showing the farmer a barn he's seen every day of his life, but he's
never seen it in that way. That's the purpose of art (in my view).
A photograph is just another way of showing someone something. It's useful, or at least very interesting, to understand how another person sees it. The artist might be trying to get a message across and he wonders of the viewer of the picture got it. Or there might be things about the picture that the artist didn't even realize, because he was thinking about something else.
I took a photography course in college, and of course there was a book to read, an anthology of essays written by various photographers over the last century and a half. The forward of the book made it clear that the editor didn't believe there was a whole lot to be learned by READING about photography. If you could explain a photograph entirely in words, the photograph itself is useless! Its like the old saying (I don't know where it came from): Writing about music is like dancing about architecture.
But having other people critique your photographs can be very useful, especially when you're just starting out. You want to know how well you're sharing your vision. Are you making things too obvious? Are you just repeating a cliche? Do your photographs make people smile, or wonder, or inspire yearnings in them?
Photography is a -language-. It's meant to -say- things. In order to use it to communicate, you need to have some understanding of how your photos are seen by others, that's what Weston meant about understanding your fellow man.
A photograph is just another way of showing someone something. It's useful, or at least very interesting, to understand how another person sees it. The artist might be trying to get a message across and he wonders of the viewer of the picture got it. Or there might be things about the picture that the artist didn't even realize, because he was thinking about something else.
I took a photography course in college, and of course there was a book to read, an anthology of essays written by various photographers over the last century and a half. The forward of the book made it clear that the editor didn't believe there was a whole lot to be learned by READING about photography. If you could explain a photograph entirely in words, the photograph itself is useless! Its like the old saying (I don't know where it came from): Writing about music is like dancing about architecture.
But having other people critique your photographs can be very useful, especially when you're just starting out. You want to know how well you're sharing your vision. Are you making things too obvious? Are you just repeating a cliche? Do your photographs make people smile, or wonder, or inspire yearnings in them?
Photography is a -language-. It's meant to -say- things. In order to use it to communicate, you need to have some understanding of how your photos are seen by others, that's what Weston meant about understanding your fellow man.
As photography emerged from the Victorian era and artists found creative ways to replicate reality on light-sensitive film, Edward Weston played a major role in bringing the art form to the wider world.
Coined as 'straight photography', Weston explained his creative philosophy: “The camera should be used for a recording of life, for rendering the very substance and quintessence of the thing itself.
He has been called "one of the most innovative and influential American photographers..." and "one of the masters of 20th-century photography."
What was the intention of Edward Weston in photographing bell peppers?
It was a bright idea, a perfect relief for the pepper and adding reflecting light to important contours. I still had the pepper which caused me a week's work, I had decided I could go no further with it, yet something kept me from taking it to the kitchen, the end of all good peppers.
What characterizes the photographs of Edward Weston?
Along with Ansel Adams, Weston pioneered a modernist style characterized by the use of a large-format camera to create sharply focused and richly detailed black-and-white photographs.
Learn more about What characterizes the photographs of Edward Weston? here: https://brainly.com/question/16978646
#SPJ2
