Explanation:
One point from Orwell’s essay “Politics and the English Language” with which I agree is the importance of clear and concise language in political discourse. Orwell argues that the use of jargon, metaphors, and other rhetorical devices can muddy the meaning of language and make it more difficult for people to understand and discuss political ideas. I agree with this because I believe that clear and concise language is essential for effective communication, especially in matters of politics, where there are often many complex issues at play. When language is unclear, it can be easy for misunderstandings and miscommunications to arise, which can make it difficult for people to come to agreements or engage with each other in a meaningful way. In addition, Orwell suggests that the use of politically motivated language can lead to the manipulation of public opinion, which I also believe is a significant concern.One point from Orwell’s essay with which I disagree is his view on the use of idiomatic language. Orwell believes that the use of idiomatic language can obfuscate meaning, and he goes so far as to suggest that writers should “never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you were used to seeing in your textbooks.” I disagree with this because I believe that the use of idiomatic language can provide color and richness to writing, and can help to make complex ideas more relatable and accessible to a wider audience. In addition, I believe that idiomatic language can play an important role in shaping culture and reflecting the values and beliefs of a society. However, I do agree with Orwell’s overall recommendation to use clear and concise language when discussing political ideas, and to avoid the use of jargon and other rhetorical devices that can obscure meaning.
