Answer:
The argument is invalid. The conclusion does not follow from the premises.
Step-by-step explanation:
The first premise is "All scientists need to understand math." This does not mean that everyone who understands math is a scientist. There are many people who understand math who are not scientists, such as engineers, accountants, and teachers.
The second premise is "Kyle understands math." This does not mean that Kyle is a scientist. There are many people who understand math who are not scientists, as mentioned above.
Therefore, the conclusion "Therefore, Kyle is a scientist" does not follow from the premises
