Respuesta :

if the Supreme didn't have the power to interpret the Constitution, they wouldn't be able to explain Exactly what all of the rights mean, for example, if the supreme court couldn't interpret the constitution we wouldn't know exactly what it means to have freedom of speech or how woman have the right to vote. People wouldn't have even the slightest idea to what the Constitution means and what rights we have and our limitations on what we can and can't do. This could result in total chaos because people would take advantage of this and try to get over the law. 

The Supreme Court has the power to enact the constitution, formed by the constituents of the Senate. Truly, constitutions are established and tested by the members of Senate and President and they have the power to choose the magistrate for the Supreme Court. The principal purpose of the Supreme Court is to implement these constitutes in the society to maintain its security. When a law or policy is formed by these members, the judges of the Supreme Court observe its validity within the structure of constitutions and notify when found any irrelevancy or their laws violate the laws of constitutions. It also has the authority to inform the President when he is going to violet the rules of the state. If the Supreme Court has limited power for the analysis in the constitutions, some policies might be assembled by the Senate which is against the laws of forming constituents and right of the people.

ACCESS MORE