How did the rulers of native american, European, and African empires and kingdoms secure and sustain their power? how did ordinary people benefit from, or suffer under, their rule?

The rulers of native American, European, African, and Asian empires and kingdoms secured and sustained their power by: (1) they made sure (or at least tried) that only one family must rule, (2) they made sure that their military is strong, (3) They see to it that connections must be made with neighboring powers and if they do not cooperate, they must be destroyed, and (4) they made sure that their subordinates see them as gods.

The ordinary people benefited from these methods of power preservation because all they needed to worry about was food. The disadvantage however is since the seat of power is only given to the ruling elite, they got no say in politics. Plus if the rulers decide their empire or kingdom will go to war, they basically end up being the victims of it.

biruci biruci · Answer 2 · 2019-09-17T11:55:17+02:00

Native Americans had plentiful populace, a forceful bureaucratic state, prolific agriculture, chiefdoms or paramount chiefdoms, paid tax and payment, and occasionally diminutive political organization that could sustain and secure their power compared to European kings and princes who had vast land, compulsorily recruited men for military, and occupied farmer with nobles had enormous lands and handled hundreds of farmer families. On the other hand, African had slighter vassal kingdoms and depended on the military for control.

EXPLANATION:

• European

European communes ran the feudal structure to launch power and labor in the Middle Ages. Europeans drove under a belief of private property rights, compared to shared African or Native American populace of the time. These populaces were unified by the Christian Church, which operated as the foundational establishing convention of many Europeans' daily lives.

• Native American

The city size and the greatness of its power indicate that the city depended on some lesser chiefdoms under a paramount leader power. Social stratification was partially well-maintained through regular opposition. War prisoners were imprisoned, and the prisoners influenced a crucial part of the North American Southeast economy. Slavery of Native American was not established on retaining people as property.

Native Americans comprehended slaves as people who are lacked in kinship systems. Slavery was not usually a perpetual condition. Regularly, an earlier slave could become completely combined associate of the community. Marriage or adoption could let a slave come in a kinship system and join the populace. Slavery and prisoner transacting became a crucial way that most Native communities regrew and maintained or gained power.

• African

Africa was reigned by different empires with its own culture, government, religion, and so on for hundreds of years before this era. Each African kingdom was extremely unique, just one edge of an unparalleled diversity land—before foreign raiders occupied this land while at the same time slicing it up amid themselves and grouping it all mutually into a single location they used to know as "Africa."

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• How did the rulers of native American, European, and African empires and kingdoms secure and sustain their power? https://brainly.com/question/4960910

Keywords : Native American, European, Africa, ruler

Subject : History

Class : 10-12

Sub-Chapter : Civilization