Question

PLEASE HELP !!! A student is writing an argumentative essay about the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas. This student is going against the idea so far they have this written down : Controlling fires to protect wild areas is a very slight possibility. Therefore, controlling fires to protect wild areas should be prevented. The main reason for why people shouldn't use fires to protect wild areas is because we don't know for sure if the fire can be controlled. There's always a chance that the fire could go out of control and turn into a real raging fire that might be hard to put out. Maybe it could turn into a disasterous Wild Fire. Another reason for why people shouldn't use fires to protect wild areas is because the fires could easily damage not only crops and vegetation but animal life as well. What is a good ending claim for this introduction?

Answer 1

And last, this would cause a great deal of air pollution. Trees are the ones that are helping taking in our carbon dioxide, and now we're releasing even more into the air now. In the end, fires may cause a catastrophic ecosystem.

Answer 2

Answer:

Wild forest fires cause extensive damage to flora and fauna and result in destruction of man-made property in and around the area of fire. The forest fires have the possibility of destruction, further air pollution, And the death of many species and organisms. Our planet has been consistently harmed by our footprint, especially after the Industrial Revolution. Although Forest Fires have some seemingly positive effects, the negative effects on nature outweigh them. This would destroy the biodiversity of our planet, and destroy our planet by increasing climate change and temperatures.

Controlled fires are used by agriculturists and forest officials to keep wild fires at bay. It involves careful, controlled burning of certain areas of the forest, to clear it off inflammable organic matter. In the event of fire, this cleared-off area acts as a barrier for fire from spreading further. This also leads to the withering and extinction of plant species, although the soil becomes more fertile the plants were burned and killed in the process.  Therefore we are lessening plant species, and lessening our oxygen intake. It also lessens ground for construction. By wasting land and dousing it in fire, we lose the economic opportunity, to build houses, and lessen our debt.

The Biodiversity gets damaged, causes further issues, setting a chain reaction, and leading to multitude extinctions. This causes the ecosystem and planet to go into disarray. Climate change is an already  an increasing issues, and wild fires include in tempatures. We are essentially damaging the enviroment to fix it. It is an immense threat, and CLimate Change leads to further forest fires. By increasing use of forsest fires, the gorund itself becomes unsustainable. The effeort and money used for forest fires could be spent on food charity, or land for farmers. Helping the economy.

In the process of controlled burning, several wild animals are killed and lose their habitat. Thick smoke from such man-made fires is a cause for environmental concern too. It is immensely important to stop using forest fires. In order to save our human race we must stop damaging the enviroment starting with the end of intentional forest fires. Forest fires are arson against nature.

Explanation: