Question

What was Sandford’s argument in the Scott v. Sandford case?

An enslaved person in a free state should be granted freedom.

A person’s property cannot be taken away without due process.

Enslaved people should not be considered property.

Enslaved people should have the right to a trial by jury.

Answer 1

Sanford argued that an enslaved person is categorized as property, and under the fifth amendment, a person's property cannot be taken without due process.

So the answer is:
 B.) A person's property cannot be taken away without due process

Answer 2

According to the Scott v. Sandford case, Sandford’s argument include option B:  A person’s property cannot be taken away without due process.

What was Sandford’s argument?

Sandford's argument during the case was that property is not brought from him that is mainly known as constitution.

The court became totally agreed on his consent because the treated the Constitution as a pro-slavery document. This argument took more time for its accomplishment.

Therefore, correct option is B.

Learn more about argument, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/1305239