n Korematsu v. US (1944), the Supreme Court ruled that in a time of great “emergency and peril,” the internment of Japanese Americans was

Question

27-03-2017
History

contestada

n Korematsu v. US (1944), the Supreme Court ruled that in a time of great “emergency and peril,” the internment of Japanese Americans was

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Which equation represents a physical change? (1) H2O(s) + 6.01 kJ ==>H2O(l) (2) 2H2(g) + O2(g) ==>2H2O(g) + 483.6 kJ (3) H2(g) + I2(g) + 53.0 kJ ==>2HI

Which environmental factor would likely lead to an increase in genetic variation in a population of squirrels? an increase in predators an increase in available

Despite being _______________, Robert e. Lee signed on as a Confederate General because he was __________________. a. anti-slavery / pro-Virginia c. anti-slaver

Ryan lives in Texas. For vacation, he wants to drive to a foreign country that is warm and English-speaking. Which of the following vacation spots would be the

Which of the following is an example of an object that could have a net force greater than zero acting on it? A. a glass resting on a table B.

Antony says that Brutus is the noblest Roman of them all because a. of all the conspirators, Brutus alone acted for the good of Rome rather than for personal ga

Evaluate You stuffed 91 envelopes in 35 minutes. At this rate, how many envelopes can you stuff in 1.5 hours?

Which factor does not affect soil formation? type of rock time of exposure surface area animal intrusion

If 80% is 72 marks, what is full marks?

ACCESS MORE EDU ACCESS

holesstanham holesstanham · Answer 1 · 2018-12-05T01:23:08+01:00

Answer: Constitutional

Korematsu v United States (1944) is a controversial Supreme Court case. It discussed the constitutionality of internment camps for Japanese Americans during World War II. The ruling declared that internment was constitutional.

The court's view was that the risk of espionage and the need to defend against it outweighed the rights of Japanese Americans. In 2011, the DoJ filed an official notice, accepting that the Solicitor General's defense at the time had been erroneous.

avantikar avantikar · Answer 2 · 2019-10-30T06:59:30+01:00

N Korematsu v. US (1944), the Supreme Court ruled that in a time of great “emergency and peril,” the internment of Japanese Americans was constitutional.

Further Explanation:-

During the initial days of world war 2, President of United States, Franklin Roosevelt issued and executive order which was known as Executive order 6066 and according to this order he authorized the military of United States to ban people who belonged to Japanese ancestry regardless of their citizenship who belong from the areas of West coast as it deemed important to the national security. Because of this order they were forced to leave their homes. and were made to stay in internment camps throughout the period of Conflict. It was then American born citizen who was of Japanese Ancestry named Fred Korematsu who denied the order and said that he won’t be leaving his house and because of his denial, he was charged in violation of the exclusion order.This case went to U.S Supreme court of United States as Korematsu v. United States and Supreme court ruled, 6-3 in the majority of United States as it held that the exclusion order by President was constitutional and further the court refused to address the larger question that arise which was regarding the legality of Japanese Detention camp program.

Learn more:

1. How did Theodore Roosevelt’s square deal help the environment? https://brainly.com/question/903212

2. Which of the following was Hitler’s first violation of the treaty of Versailles? https://brainly.com/question/1214724

3. During the cold war, how were the policy of containment and the domino theory related? https://brainly.com/question/903212

Answer Details:

Grade – High School

Subject – History

Chapter – Korematsu v. United States

Keywords –Korematsu, United States, Executive order, President, Roosevelt, West Coast, Japanese, Internment camp, Conflict, Constitutional, Detention, Legality.