In this discussion, you will discuss the perspectives of the colonizers and the colonized. In your response, cite at least one piece of evidence for each perspective. What differences existed between the two perspectives? What assumptions did the two groups make about each other? What methods were effective at acquiring and resisting power?

Respuesta :

Explanation:

1. Colonizers were people who wanted land for its resources and didn't care much about the people. The people were just in their way of getting wealth and being powerful in Europe.  The colonists who were on the land were forced to work and trade with the colonizing country in order to make them richer.

2. Colonizers believed that people in colonies were more or less expendable and that they were often uneducated lower class and that they had the right to colonize them and introduce a civilization. Colonists wanted to be respected and to be free in the colonies and have their own sovereignty since they lived in the area.

3. Acquiring power was done through direct conquering, like sending military to take an area, or by trading and getting people to earn money which would provide them with political power, or by negotiating with locals who would give their land. Resisting power was difficult and people had to organize things like riots or protests or share propaganda among people in order to get them to join their cause.

Answer:

So, the colonized were tired of being forced to learn the puritan ways so they assumed they would never have freedom of religion unless they left Britain.

The Colonizers assumed that they were committing treason and wanted the colonized dead.

Having a big army can be of  great assistance in acquiring power

A method of resisting power is what the colonized used to sneak out of Britain and it is called patience because they had to wait until a ship like the mayflower to become available. Also another method of resisting power is Faith.

Hope it helped