if i said that a claim is true because it has its foundation in the democratic party, i am arguably committing what error in reasoning?

Question

19-12-2022
Social Studies

contestada

if i said that a claim is true because it has its foundation in the democratic party, i am arguably committing what error in reasoning?

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

How do the words dream, lazy, and lullaby affect the first stanza of "July"? a. They create a calm and relaxed mood. b. They add humor. c. They add energetic im

What event brought the end of the Mesozoic Era? A. a minor earthquake B. the evolution of bacteria C. a global mass extinction D.

In theory, to gain one pound of body weight per week, you d need to consume an additional: a. ten grams of fat per meal. b. six servings of protein per week.

motor end plates are associated with

Statistical measures of change in an economy are called: A. portfolios B. indices C. exchanges D. stocks Prior to investing, you should A. do no planning. B. c

The sum of a number, 1/6 of that number, 2 1/2 times that number, and 7 is 12 1/2. Find that number.

a rectangle has a perimeter of 34 cm. if 2/3 of its length is equal to 3/4 of its width. find the dimensions of the rectangle.

Which was a geographic factor in the development of different ways of life among Native American groups? A. The Great Plains were barren with few animals to

Evaluate A2 for A = -3. -9 -6 6 9

ACCESS MORE

arenasaleem890 arenasaleem890 · Answer 1 · 2022-12-24T19:55:07+01:00

One would argue that if I claimed that something was true just because the democratic party supported it, I would be committing genetic fraudulence.

The genetic fallacy, sometimes referred to as the origins fallacy or the fallacy of virtue, is an irrelevant fallacy in which arguments or facts are rejected or validated entirely based on their source of origin rather than its content. In other words, rather than the assertion itself, a claim is discounted or given credibility based on its source.

As a result, the fallacy disregards the validity of the assertion. The first requirement of a strong argument is that the premises must be relevant to the truth or falsity of the central claim. Genetic descriptions of a problem could be accurate and could shed light on the reasons why the problem has taken on its current shape, but they cannot decide whether the problem is good or bad.

Learn more about " genetic fallacy " to visit here;

https://brainly.com/question/27123023?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4