in response to the objection that there is a chance that innocent people will be executed, primoratz group of answer choices denies that this ever happens admits that this is a good reason to prohibit capital punishment in our society admits this but claims that it would still be unjust to abolish capital punishment because murderers would not be receiving proportional punishment to their crimes points out that innocent people are killed by all sorts of permissible activities, including driving

In response to the objection that there is a chance that innocent people will be executed, primoratz states D: "murderers would not be receiving proportional punishment for their crimes".

According to the primoratz, deterrence is entirely irrelevant to the argument for keeping the death penalty. In response to the objection that imposing the death penalty results in bounding to put to death of some innocent people, Primoratz states that in case of abolishing the death penalty, murderers would not be receiving proportional punishment for their crimes because criminals who deserve less than the death penalty would be treated unfairly.

You can learn more about criminal punishments at

https://brainly.com/question/22650492

#SPJ4