scientists calculated the net primary productivity at two different forest sites. both forests have the same gross primary productivity. forest a has a net primary productivity of 1,650kcal/m2/year, and forest b has a net primary productivity of 1,110kcal/m2/year. which of the following statements is best supported by the data? responses forest a has a higher rate of decomposition by bacteria than forest b. forest a has a higher rate of decomposition by bacteria than forest b . forest a has more biodiversity than forest b. forest a has more biodiversity than forest b . forest a producers have lower rates of cellular respiration than forest b producers. forest a producers have lower rates of cellular respiration than forest b producers. forest a producers have more biomass than forest b producers.

Net primary productivity is the amount of biomass (organic matter) left over after cellular respiration has been subtracted from gross primary productivity. As Forest A has a higher net primary productivity than Forest B, this suggests that the producers in Forest A have lower rates of cellular respiration than the producers in Forest B.

This means that the producers in Forest A are able to convert more of their gross primary productivity into biomass than the producers in Forest B, resulting in a higher net primary productivity.

For more questions like Net primary productivity click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/3145161

#SPJ4