The statement given in question is absolutely ture which is "a security incident that is investigated improperly can result in substantial legal problems for a company."
In our legal system, the 'process' (lawsuit), externalized by the procedure, can be analysed in predetermined elements and consists of: 1. parts (plaintiff and defendant) + 2. cause of petition (facts of the case and law invoked) + 3. prayer for relief.
If determined lawsuit is repeated the res iudicata clause will impede its judgment. But for that to happen, a previously substantial decision must exist, that is, the 'merit' of the demand (lawsuit) must have been decided, in a conclusive manner. That exclude cases that have ended without positive judgment.
Learn more about substantial issues here ; https://brainly.com/question/28183258?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
