How did the supreme court majority argue that ""separate but equal"" facilities were legal? check all that apply.

Question

30-11-2022
History

contestada

How did the supreme court majority argue that ""separate but equal"" facilities were legal? check all that apply.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

How do fuses make using electrical energy safer? A.) A fuse opens an electric circuit when the current gets too high. When a circuit is open, a current is un

A bottle holds 8.2 ounces of disinfecting soap. Jesse used 0.2 of the soap in the bottle to clean the kitchen floor. How many ounces of soap did she use?

Jorge bought a crate of floor tiles for $95.94. Crate had 6 boxes of floor tiles.Each box contained 20 floor tiles. Write and solve an equation to determine cos

Which fragment is made up of a complete subject? A.the loudest musical instruments B.blasted the notes to the thrill of parade-goers C.applauded for all of the

In parallelogram abcd, ab=14, bc=20, m(angle)b=54. Find to the nearest tenth the length of diagonal bd, and find measure angle dbc to the nearest degree.

Which ordered pair is a solution of 3y+2=2x-5?

Reasons why South Africa must include renewable energy in it's energy mix

MULTIPLE CHOICE!Like to the lark at break of day arising From sullen earth, sings hymns at heaven's gate; For thy sweet love remember'd such wealth brings

This is a statistics problem. A 90% confidence interval for the mean percentage of airline reservations being canceled on the day of the flight is (1.3% , 5%).

I need to find x for this geometry question

RELAXING NOICE

akursharma9034 akursharma9034 · Answer 1 · 2022-12-03T10:48:28+01:00

It was said to support maintaining public order and the peace. Social rights were not covered by the Constitution; only civil and political rights were. that's the supreme court majority

The Court concluded that as long as the races (blacks and whites) enjoyed separate facilities of equal kind, "segregation" was "not a form of discrimination." Its purpose was to keep the society's peace and orderly. This was upheld as constitutional in the "Plessy v. Ferguson" case by the Supreme Court. Homer Plessy was a multiracial individual. He boarded an airplane for Louisiana. He sat in a seat that was open in the whites-only car. Because it was just for white people, the conductor insisted that he get off the vehicle. Plessy declined because, in his opinion, it went against his "Equal Protection Clause" right. His arrest followed. The Supreme Court responded by arguing that only civil and political rights were included by the Constitution. Social rights were not included in it. The right to board a train is a social one, not guaranteed by the Constitution.

Learn more about supreme court from

brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ4