Respuesta :
Trial court decisions are not binding precedent for trial courts in the American legal system. Even San Diego's trial courts legal precedent frequently reach similar conclusions, they aren't bound by one another.
A trial court judge may refer to a case that was tried at her level for guidance, but she is free to reject the verdict and reach her own legal precedent conclusion if she so chooses.
The Supreme Court and appellate courts are expected to be followed by the trial courts. When it comes to constitutional matters, state trial courts American legal system typically follow the rulings of their respective state appellate courts. The U.S. Supreme Court and federal appeals courts are consulted by federal courts.
Lower courts within the same jurisdiction must follow an order from a higher court, and courts from other jurisdictions may choose to follow the order or take a different course of action. For instance, a judge in the legal precedent New York District Court determined in 2015 that confessions made at an AA meeting ought to be protected religious confessions. Despite this, since the New York District Court only has American legal system jurisdiction over a small portion of New York's counties, Californian judges are not required to follow this ruling in those counties. Instead, they are free to do as they see fit.
Learn more about legal precedent here
https://brainly.com/question/1751986
#SPJ4
