Respuesta :
The individual is then placed in an arena with two doors, one containing a gorgeous lady and the other a man executing a tiger.
They have to choose one of the doors; if they choose the lady, they will marry her immediately, regardless of whether he is already married, which to the people indicates that he was innocent. If the person chooses the tiger, they will probably die, which they interpret as evidence that he was guilty.
The arena is very entertaining and has a lot of tension. Because of this, the king only conducts trials in the area that pique his interest, and people flock to see the trials he conducts. Naturally, it is completely unfair: What happens if a person accused of a crime does not merit the death penalty and is brought into the arena? Why should someone who is innocent face the same chance of suffering a terrible fate as someone who is guilty?
Take note of the parallel outcomes of the accused's encounter with either the lady or the tiger: bells, punishment, and how the audience responds. Similar to the hired mourners, this emphasizes the theatrical and ritualistic nature of the trial by the arena. In addition, it is ironic and darkly funny that someone who does not want to be married and views marriage as a punishment could be "rewarded" with marriage.
To learn more about tigers, refer:-
https://brainly.com/question/5145765
#SPJ4
