Given data
Step 1: State the null and alternative hypothesis
[tex]\begin{gathered} \mu=70\text{ \% = 0.7} \\ \text{Hence H}_0=0.7 \end{gathered}[/tex][tex]H_{\alpha}\ne0.7[/tex]Step 2: Declare the significance level
• sample size (n) = 150
,• Get the standard deviation (s)
[tex]\begin{gathered} \mu=0.7 \\ 1-\mu=1-0.7=0.3 \\ \end{gathered}[/tex][tex]\begin{gathered} s=\sqrt[]{\frac{\mu(1-\mu)}{n}} \\ \\ s=\sqrt[]{\frac{0.7\text{ x 0.3}}{150}} \\ \\ s=0.037 \end{gathered}[/tex]Step 3: Find the significance level
[tex]\begin{gathered} Z=\frac{\bar{x}-\mu}{s}=\frac{0.6-0.7}{0.037} \\ \\ Z=-2.703 \end{gathered}[/tex]Step 4: Find the corresponding probability of the Z-score, since it is two-tailed test, then
[tex]\begin{gathered} P(Z<-2.7)+P(Z>2.7) \\ \Rightarrow0.0035+0.0035 \\ \Rightarrow0.007 \end{gathered}[/tex]Conclusion
Since the P-value of the z-score is less than the P-value of the alpha level
That is 0.007 < 0.05, therefore the null hypothesis will be rejected
Therefore, we can conclude that the card company's claim is invalid