Respuesta :
1) Prospective cohort study. 2) Table below. 3) Relative risk = 2.466. 4) The risk of developing asthma is greater in people exposed to the pesticide than in people not exposed to it. 5) Not knowing other risk factors that could cause asthma.
What are prospective and retrospective cohort studies?
Prospective and retrospective studies are carried out depending on the aim of the research.
- Retrospective studies analyze the reason for which something occurred or explain an event or recent discovery.
Individuals from the study groups in these cases have already been affected.
- Prospective studies are carried out to predict a future event.
Most individuals from the study groups in these cases have not been affected. However, some of them might have been or might have high risks of being affected.
1)
The exposed study case is an example of a prospective cohort study.
It analyzes the connection (relationship) between being exposed to the pesticide and being affected by asthma.
It is carried out to predict if people exposed to pesticides have more chances of developing asthma or not.
2) Data
- Total number of individuals exposed to pesticides: 318
- Individuals who developed asthma: 69
- Individuals who did not develop asthma: 249
- Total number of individuals not exposed to pesticides: 990
- Individuals who developed asthma: 87
- Individuals who did not develop asthma: 903
Pesticide Expossure Asthmatic Not Asmathic Total
Yes 69 249 318
No 87 903 990
Total 156 1152 1308
3) Measures of association
Exposed people
attack rate = affected people with asthma / exposed people
attack rate = 69/318
attack rate = 0.217
Attack rate for peope exposed to pesticide, ARE = 0.217
Not Exposed people
attack rate = affected people with asthma / not exposed people
attack rate = 87/990
attack rate = 0.088
Attack rate for peope not exposed to pesticide, ARNE = 0.088
Being exposed
Relative risk = ARE / ARNE
Relative risk = 0.217 / 0.088
Relative risk = 2.466
4) Interpretation:
- Relative risk = 1 ⇒ the risk of being affected is the same for the exposed and unexposed groups. Being exposed is not related to being affected.
- Relative risk > 1 ⇒ the risk of being affected is greater for the exposed group than for the unexposed group. Being exposed is closely related to being affected.
- Relative risk < 1 ⇒ the risk of being affected is greater for the unexposed group than for the exposed group.
In the exposed example, relative risk is greater than 1 (Rr>1)
This means that the risk of developing asthma is greater in people exposed to the pesticide than in people not exposed to it.
Pesticide exposure might be a significant risk factor for asthma development.
5) Weakness of this study design
A weakness of the study could be that no other risk factor is considered.
There could be another factor affecting people and causing asthma development. This factor could be affecting both groups.
You can learn more about Prospective and retrospective studies at
https://brainly.com/question/14835847
https://brainly.com/question/14548299
#SPJ1