The option that describes why this is an example of inductive reasoning is A. It starts with details and uses them to support a more sweeping statement.
It should be noted that an inductive reasoning is a method of drawing conclusions by going from the specific to the general.
It's usually contrasted with deductive reasoning, where one goes from general information to specific conclusions. ln this case, the option that describes why this is an example of inductive reasoning is that it starts with details and uses them to support a more sweeping statement.
Learn more about reasoning on:
https://brainly.com/question/9523902
#SPJ1
Which best describes why this is an example of inductive reasoning? It starts with details and uses them to support a more sweeping statement. It makes an assertion, then counters arguments against that assertion. It defends an argument with carefully researched facts and excerpts. It uses an anecdote to support a broad claim about the injustices of slavery.
