Question

part B complete the chart to compare and contrast the need for security with the sacrifice of individual rights.

Answer 1

This prompt requires a comparative response to the subject of Need for Security versus Sacrifice of Individual Rights.

What are the arguments that support the need for security over individual rights?

The need for security is listed or considered as a natural right

Accordingly, the right to security, the State must take reasonable precautions to ensure a person's security (both physical and mental).

The government does this, for instance, through the work of the police and emergency services. A person cannot be arbitrarily detained or arrested, according to section 2.

On the other hand, individual rights are listed as the following, the right to:

• habeas corpus
• the presumption of innocence
• an unbiased tribunal
• quick and public trials
• an attorney
• a jury trial
• not to be forced to testify against oneself
• the avoidance of double jeopardy, and
• challenge a court decision.

One of the individual rights which is always at variance with the need for security is the right to privacy. The argument here is that some element of privacy must be given up in order to achieve a more secure state.

The above is given as a general answer given that the referenced chart is unavailable.

Learn more about Individual Rights at:
https://brainly.com/question/2535946
#SPJ1

Answer 2

Answer:

Explanation:

plato answer