What qualities did the british writer harriet martineau and the french writer alexis de tocqueville find notable about americans in the 1830s?

Question

28-07-2022
Social Studies

contestada

What qualities did the british writer harriet martineau and the french writer alexis de tocqueville find notable about americans in the 1830s?

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Why did foreign nations want to establish spheres of influence in China?

All else being equal and assuming logistic population growth, fishing efforts should __________ in order to maintain the highest population growth rate of a fis

What was the nickname for u.s. soldiers in world war i? answers?

Clove cigarettes typically contain ____ tobacco and ____ clove.

what is the range of y=x^2-5 when the domain is

if im sailing from spain west to flordia what wind do i use?

Only boxes less than 3.50 ft wide willl fit through the doorway.Which measurements show the widths of three boxes that will fit through the doorway

Fred always announces his decisions at weekly staff meetings. he doesn't waste time asking for employee input because he already knows what he wants to do. this

As I was nearing the end of my trip to the village where my grandfather grew up, I reflected on all that I had seen. The conditions that he had lived in as a yo

What best describes russian society in the seventeenth century?

ACCESS MORE

Tutorconsortium323 Tutorconsortium323 · Answer 1 · 2022-08-06T16:58:59+02:00

Their Energy and Materialism qualities did the British writer Harriet Martineau and the French writer Alexis de Tocqueville find notable about Americans in the 1830s.

INTERPRETATION-

In 1830 Alexis de Tocqueville and Gustave de Beaumont, both French, were sent by the Gallic government to analyze the American prison system. Arriving in New York in May, they spent nine months traveling across the country, not only observing prisons but many other aspects of American society, such as economics and politics.

Tocqueville, who was fascinated by American politics, wrote a political and hereditary analysis. The work is divided into two different volumes, published independently. In the introduction to the first the author states that he renounces writing a second volume (something that obviously will not comply). More than by the date of publication, both parties are differentiated by the subject they deal with.

The first is about the impulse that the democratic movement (which is a social transformation, before materializing in political institutions) gives to the form of government, to the laws and to political life, that is, to democracy as a political structure. The second volume deals with the influence that democracy (this time as a social transformation and as a political regime at the same time) exercises on civil society, that is, on customs, ideas and intellectual life. In short, the first volume is more political, and the second more sociological.