When a researcher reports that results of a study were not statistically significant, this can be interpreted as B. There is not enough evidence to allow the researcher to reject the null hypothesis.
IT should be noted that in a evidence in a in a research is very essential because it help the researcher to be able to gather data to be able to come up with good conclusion.
In this case, When a researcher reports that results of a study were not statistically significant, this can be interpreted as B. There is not enough evidence to allow the researcher to reject the null hypothesis.
Learn more about researcher at:
brainly.com/question/24553900
#SPJ1
CHECK THE COMPLETE QUESTION BELOW;
A researcher reports that results of a study were not statistically significant. How is this to be interpreted?
Group of answer choices
C. The researcher's logic or conceptualization in setting up the study was faulty.
B. There is not enough evidence to allow the researcher to reject the null hypothesis.
D. The intervention was not strong enough to make a difference.
