Jason believes that gun control is absolutely wrong and that the right to possess guns is an absolute right. Jason would probably be closest to the initial stage of reflective judgment.
The reflective judgment model (RJM) describes the improvement of complicated reasoning in overdue teens and adults, and the way the epistemological assumptions people keep are associated with the manner they make judgments approximately arguable (unwell-structured) problems.
Reflective judgment involves rationally defended insights and is regularly used to resolve unwell-based issues. Overpopulation, hunger, and pollution are examples of unwell-based problems that require reflective judgment.
However Kant thinks that it is also feasible to interpret prediction inside the opposite route: this is, from “determinate” to “determinable.” This is the “reflective” interpretation of predication in a judgment, now not most effective because it advances logically from a particular person or narrower idea to a usual or extra.
Learn more about reflective judgment here: https://brainly.com/question/3735128
#SPJ1
