The defense where the tortfeasor asserts that the injured party's conduct has played a factor in the harm suffered is known as?

Question

27-07-2022
Health

contestada

The defense where the tortfeasor asserts that the injured party's conduct has played a factor in the harm suffered is known as?

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

A parent volunteer group is raising money by making custom hats to sell at school activities. They plan to sell the hats for $12. Each hat costs $6 to make. The

Does anyone know how to solve this question?

How do you know which standardized test statistics you will use? A Z or T?

Iris wants to buy two necklaces, one for her sister and one for herself. The necklace for her sister costs $42.00, and the necklace for herself costs $28.00. Th

59:21 Read the excerpt from The Green Gables Letters by L. M. Montgomery. The woods are getting ready to sleep—they are not yet asleep but they are disrobing an

When the palmaris longus muscle in the forearm is flexed, the wrist moves back and forth. If the muscle generates a force of 39.5 N39.5 N and it is acting with

To rent a certain meeting room, a college charges a reservation fee of $36 and an additional fee of $5.60 per hour. The film club wants to spend at most $58.40

D = R = Function? Find the domain and range of each relation. Then, determine if the relation is a function.

activity 1 more or less, pls answer this ASAP

Rick is traveling at a rate of 9 miles every 12 minutes. Ann is traveling at a rate of 50 miles an hour. If both cars start at the same place at the same time,

ACCESS MORE

anvitanvar032 anvitanvar032 · Answer 1 · 2022-08-03T09:13:13+02:00

The defense where the tortfeasor asserts that the injured party's conduct has played a factor in the harm suffered is known as comparative negligence.

Comparative negligence is a legal defense that limits the amount of damages that a plaintiff can receive in a negligence-based claim based on the extent to which their own negligence contributed to the harm.
Comparative negligence is also known as non-absolute contributory negligence outside of the United States.
A negligent plaintiff may be able to receive some compensation for their injuries because to comparative negligence.
Simply because the plaintiff did not employ reasonable care, the defendant cannot be totally absolved of liability under the doctrine of comparative negligence.

learn more about comparative negligence here: https://brainly.com/question/15058029

#SPJ4