Question

Read the passage from a debate speech.

The current trade situation in this nation is unacceptable. We continue to lose money to other nations, while those nations prosper. I have a detailed plan to get our country—and its people—back on the right track. My opponent, who uses her time to spread lies and rumors while eating nice dinners bought by you taxpayers, does not even have a plan. I question her priorities.

Which statement best explains why the evidence provided in the text is a fallacy?

The speaker uses anecdotal evidence with phrases like “back on the right track.”
The speaker uses a bandwagon statement by complaining that other nations prosper.
The speaker uses an ad hominem argument by attacking an opponent’s honesty.
The speaker uses a false dilemma by claiming to have the ideal plan.

Answer 1

The statement that best explains why the evidence provided in the text is a fallacy is "The speaker uses an ad hominem argument by attacking an opponent’s honesty."Thus, the correct option is C.

What is Evidence?

Evidence may be defined as a kind of literary appliance that emerges in diverse varieties of articles and theses, in the physique of paraphrasing and citations.

The context of this story illustrates that an ad hominem fallacy is a defective assertion that preaches the antagonist´s genuine contents of his or her assertions.

According to this evidence, the aggression is centered on the antagonist's stretch of untruths while feasting nice feasts paid with taxation payer's finances.

Therefore, the correct option for this question is C.

To learn more about Fallacy, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/1971023

#SPJ1