Explanation:
So This problem doesn’t get anywhere near the precision required that would require consideration of relativistic effects (simple relativity) and thus, they can be ignored. They wouldn’t change the answer within the precision you’re going to use to calculate it.
Note that, Newton’s “Laws” motion are a misnomer. The science community quit calling things “Law(s) of . . . [fill in blank]” over a century ago. They’re not really immutable as Einstein’s “Theory” of Special Relativity turned Newtonian mechanics on its ear. So Everything - all mathematical models used in Physics - they are considered as provisional. They’re good as long as they are consistent, fit observations, and predict things that haven’t been observed yet properly when they are eventually observed. But In other words, they’re not just descriptive models, they’re also predictive as well.
Due to Newton’s “Laws” motion were close, extremely close, so close that they work in nearly all practical, real-world applications, but they weren’t quite complete yet. You need to get past Newtonian Mechanics too - his three “laws” of motion and his “law” of gravity before you launch into special or general relativity and their effects, Thus, you’re a long way away from that.
