Gerwin’s daughter Mary was seeking a position as an associate attorney with Baker, Charles & Dixon, a large metropolitan law firm. The firm, after several meetings with Mary over a two-month period, made Mary an offer of employment on January 15, 1985. Mary accepted the offer that day and immediately left for Cape Cod to celebrate without telling Gerwin or anyone else about her new job. Two days later, Gerwin sent Baker a letter in which she offered to give Baker all of her legal business (approximately $40,000 per year) if Baker would hire Mary. After Gerwin learned that Mary had already been hired by Baker, Gerwin refused to transfer her business to Baker. Baker has brought suit against Gerwin on the grounds that a valid contract exists between them. How will the case be decided?

The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.

What is a legal contract?

A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.

In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.

Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.

Learn more about a legal contract here:

https://brainly.com/question/3208041

#SPJ1