The constitutional provision common in Malloy v. Hogan (1964), Roe v. Wade (1973) , and McDonald v. Chicago (2010) is the provision of civil liberties, offered by the 14th Amendment.
Civil liberties refer to the fundamental rights of the citzens of United States of America that stand protected and safeguarded by the constitution. It directly relates to the privacy and fundamental freedoms of people.
- In the context of Malloy v. Hogan (1964) case, the defendant invoked the fifth amendment which offers him the right against self-incrimination, ensured by the 14th Amendment.
- The verdict was that the 14th Amendment protects the right of a citizen from self-incrimination.
- With regards to the Roe v. Wade (1973) case, the right of a woman-seeking abortion were confirmed and extended.
- It also addressed the 14th amendment, linking the decision to the right of privacy.
- In relation to McDonald v. Chicago, the second amendment which refers to the right to bear arms in self-defense was operational.
- Alike Malloy v. Hogan (1964) and Roe v. Wade (1973), the case upheld the 14th Amendment.
Therefore, the constitutional provision common in Malloy v. Hogan (1964), Roe v. Wade (1973) , and McDonald v. Chicago (2010) is the provision of civil liberties, offered by the 14th Amendment.
Learn more about the 14th Amendment here: https://brainly.com/question/891756
#SPJ10
